Re: RLF COMPARISON

From: Kerik ^lt;kerik@kerik.com>
Date: 09/28/05-12:22:26 PM Z
Message-id: <opsxtrzomr9xluie@mail.kerik.com>

Bob,

I haven't shot Tri-X in a looooong time, but in my experience, HP5 falls
between TMY and Tri-X, and is probably closer to Tri-X in it's reciprocity
behavior.

Can't help you on the Delta question.

Good luck!
Kerik
www.kerik.com

> DEAR LIST,
> This should be "on-topic" as I want to shoot some night photos in 8X10
> and print them in PT/PD.
> I have read and confirmed 8X10 Kodak Tri-X has significant low intensity
> reciprocity law failure. I believe T-Max 400 has less LIRLF. Does
> anyone know from experience the LIRLF of Ilford HP-5 PLUS and how it
> compares to
> Tri-X and T-Max 400?
> Also, for alt processes, how does Ilford's new Delta sheet films compare
> with their wonderful HP5-Plus.
> CHEERS!
> BOB
Received on Wed Sep 28 12:21:26 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/18/05-01:13:02 PM Z CST