Re: RLF COMPARISON

From: Jim Strain ^lt;jstrain@iquest.net>
Date: 09/28/05-01:56:56 PM Z
Message-id: <005401c5c466$c7b78a90$0a01230a@sommerbarnard.local>

Bob: I know you asked specifically about the Ilford films, but my
experience in low light with 8x10 TMAX 400 has been first rate. I do print
pt/pd. Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: RLF COMPARISON

> DEAR LIST,
> This should be "on-topic" as I want to shoot some night photos in 8X10 and
> print them in PT/PD.
> I have read and confirmed 8X10 Kodak Tri-X has significant low intensity
> reciprocity law failure. I believe T-Max 400 has less LIRLF. Does anyone
> know from experience the LIRLF of Ilford HP-5 PLUS and how it compares to
> Tri-X and T-Max 400?
> Also, for alt processes, how does Ilford's new Delta sheet films compare
> with their wonderful HP5-Plus.
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> Please check my website: http://www.bobkiss.com/
>
>
>> >
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 28 13:57:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/18/05-01:13:02 PM Z CST