It is my understanding, and always has been, that one is required to present some form of identification (whether or not it is photo, I don't know) if approached by authorities. My own amusement (of my own country's political mallarky) stems from the contradiction of ideology that the "conservative" Republican administration currently represents. Aside from the socialist turnabout in WWII under Roosevelt, the Schrub administration represents the most invasive use of government power on its own people, and don't get me started on the budget and big spending (sadly, the Republicans don't mind as long as it's not spent on poor people). I get a giggle out of these hapless sheep who "proudly" support this man(?) simply because they can't get the Schrub/Cheney bumper stickers off their cars. The only remaining scraps that still resemble the GOP flag is its embrace of Christian values and its ironic impostition on the public domain. One should really understand why so many of
these terrorist factions are screaming jihad. The 9th Crusade, brought to you by Coca-Cola, Cingular, McDonald's, and the Nestle Corporation.
Bogdan Karasek <bkarasek@videotron.ca> wrote:
What next, compulsory ID's?
"The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds.
The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer
http://www.geocities.com/tr_cunningham
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
Received on Mon May 1 00:03:58 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:26 AM Z CST