RE: Sorry to ask again but...

From: Don Bryant <dsbryant_at_bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:24:57 -0400
Message-id: <000601c6cbd3$1bad7b90$6101a8c0@athlon64>

I was going to point out that in one issue of Post Factory Journal, Carmen
Lazardo did a self portrait using her flatbet scanner.

Additionally, several photographers have made scanner top still lifes by
placing objects on their scanner platen.

Of course the issue is DOF for film scans which maybe quite a bit less than
document scanners.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Kapoor [mailto:jkapoor@jankapoor.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:14 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Sorry to ask again but...

A few years ago, I did a series of scanned self portraits (my face, not
the, er, other end!). The depth of field with my Microtek Scanmaker 4
was considerable. Also, I know 3 or 4 photographers in this area
(Atlanta) who are scanning compositions of flowers, and getting stunning
results with various scanners. I think many scanners do typically have
good depth of field.

Jan

-- 
Fine art photography of Jan Kapoor at www.jankapoor.net
Pinhole, large format, alternative printing processes and digital.
Received on 08/29/06-07:24:55 PM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 09/01/06-12:02:08 PM Z CST