RE: missing posts

Sorry for my post. I see now that your mails were actually to
<sask.usask.ca>.

Hmmmm.... That means it is rejected me. :-(

Dave S

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Soemarko [mailto:fotodave@dsoemarko.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:13 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: missing posts

Etienne,

How does your post confirm that <sask.usask.ca> still works? It seems like
both of your mails were sent to usask.ca. Could you try sending one
specifically to <sask.usask.ca>? It seems for my case, that always failed
(that is, the mail would get rejected).

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: etienne garbaux [mailto:photographeur@nerdshack.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:53 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: missing posts

I wrote:

> As a check of the above reasoning, I think this message will show up
> with <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca> in both the "From:" and
"Reply-to:"
> headers, because my outgoing e-mail is addressed that way.

Oops, I meant to say "in both the "To:" and "Reply-to:" headers." And that
was the case, confirming that the "To:" header on a list message is copied
straight from the incoming message -- <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca> in
the case of my message, and <alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca> in the case of
Christina's message.

Also, the fact that my post got through confirms that <sask.usask.ca> still
works, at least sometimes.

Best regards,

etienne
Received on Wed Feb 15 22:16:05 2006