If you remember, in my very first message to you I requested a speed
comparison in terms of stops. You can direct scientific tests similar to
those made by Sandy King while he was evaluating different lightsources
for alternative processes. See
http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Light/L2/l2.html
It's easy: just print a Traditional Cyanotype step wedge showing steps 1
and 2 merged to dmax, do the same for Cyanotype-Rex (using the same
artificial lightsource for both test) and note the exposure times. This
will give you the speed (exposure time) and contrast (printed steps)
difference between the emulsions in a very scientific and exact manner.
Will you be kind enough to do this test and share the results with us?
TIA,
Loris.
-----Original Message-----
From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: 15 Şubat 2006 Çarşamba 22:25
To: alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Cyanotype & Ferric Oxalate & APIS 2006 & Retro-invention &
Herschel
...
On working on the cyanotype rex we found that the exposures we were
getting were far shorter than one would have expected had we been using
the standard method. That was when we tried in camera photography using
cyanotype rex.
...
Received on Thu Feb 16 00:07:48 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:57 AM Z CST