Re: yes and no

I also don't have time to follow every thread but I save everything
and they are indexed for searching, so that when I need to search for
past postings by myself or others, it'll take split seconds. (Research
is about re-searching what's already discussed and not re-arguing the
same, over and over.)

Most of the issues discussed here are not that difficult in hands of
real chemists. I don't understand why organizations like center for
photographic history and technology doesn't take initiaitve on
organizing research at a decent institution with serious photography
program AND real science and engineering departments. Real research is
very expensive (and I wouldn't do it for anything outside of my
personal iterests) but there gotta be ways to do better amateur
research if the effort is somehow organized.

From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: RE: yes and no
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:12:51 -0600

> I haven't had time to read a word of it but I just keep putting the whole
> darn thread into the GUM folder for later reading or deleting. There is a
> whole 'nother issue on other forums about ink, and I'm still working on a
> 2006 calendar. Darn : )
Received on Mon Jan 30 23:38:38 2006