RE: gold print

All of the images shown seem to have low contrast. Is that normal?

  _____

From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:28 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: gold print

In a message dated 13/6/06 8:29:28 am, m.bruhat@free.fr writes:

on this list, we like show what one knows make.

I have realized a gold print on Richard de Bas 300 gr.paper for an American
photographer +David Seidner in 1994.

To realize this print, I print as for the platinum with the method ammonium
ferric oxalat and humidification before lighting UVA with the same formulate
that the platinum, substitute simply the platinum by the gold.

Only, as the contrast with gold in these conditions is very strong, I have
realized a film with very weak contrasts.

You can see it on this announcement, before I do separate.

This easy printing system and cheaper becomes interesting with inkjet films.

And then that can be a good introduction before pass to the chrysotype of
Mike Ware...

Marc Bruhat

Marc

Thanks for the exclamation marks.

I have had look at your gold print. It would be interesting to hear your
views on a comparison with my gold prints at

http://www.hands-on-pictures.com/html/rexhow.html

Terry
Received on 06/13/06-08:20:23 PM Z