RE: gold print

From: Don Bryant <dstevenbryant_at_mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:07:09 -0400
Message-id: <000601c68fcc$98b69240$6401a8c0@athlon64>

Terry,

 

On my monitor, which is a new LCD display, calibrated and profiled with an
XRITE colorimeter, the images look low contrast. I've received e-mail from
others reporting the same impressions. So are we to think these are typical
contrast ranges for this process?

 

Don Bryant

 

 

  _____

From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:26 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: gold print

 

In a message dated 14/6/06 4:08:45 pm, dstevenbryant@mindspring.com writes:

 
They sure look low contrast, how come? Maybe your scans are off.

Steve

They look alright on my monitors.

Terry

Terry King FRPS

RPS Historical Group (Chairman)

www.hands-on-pictures.com/

Moderated Discussion Group

Post message: artaltphot@yahoogroups.co.uk

Subscribe: artaltphot-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk
Unsubscribe: artaltphot-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk

1. An excellent thing is as rare as it is difficult.(Spinoza)
2. A man's reach should be beyond his grasp or what's a heaven
for.(Browning)
3. Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora.(Occam's razor or
'Keep it simple!').
4. Nullius in Verba (Horace), 'Take no man's word for it' (motto of the
Royal Society).
5. If ignorance is bliss, why are not more people happy ? (anon)
Received on 06/14/06-10:09:17 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 07/28/06-08:55:13 AM Z CST