RE: czaphotography.com website up

I see. My attempts (to test the risk) weren't as successful - it was
somehow obvious that the print was from a lo-res file. Maybe it's my
trained eyes. Thanks. I guess it depends much on the quality of the
jpeg.

Question to all: Do you consider this as disturbing risk when exhibiting
work in the web?

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bryant [mailto:dstevenbryant@mindspring.com]
Sent: 22 Haziran 2006 Perşembe 18:51
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: czaphotography.com website up

Actually Loris I can uprez with pretty good quality from screen
captures. As an experiment I did just that with a famous photogs website
and using PS bicubic I had amazingly good results when printed as an
11x14 inkjet print using QTR.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:56 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: czaphotography.com website up

Wow! Don, what interpolation program are you using? Must be a very good
one since you can make good quality (not instantly obvious that it's a
repro) inkjet prints from a 400 - 500 pixel image (in the longest
dimension) ;)

Seriously, according to you is there the risk of someone making good
quality and reasonably sized repros (see the criteria above) from
500-600 pixels images one shows in the web? According to my knowledge
this pretty unlikely.

Regards & TIA,
Loris.

P.S. The old/plain Print-Scrn trick works, therefore I take your comment
as a warning to Christina...
Received on 06/22/06-10:38:31 AM Z