Re: czaphotography.com website up

I did it this way, Camden:

went to the first page of "Very second gumprints", namely here:
http://czaphotography.com/show.php?what=gallery&which=6

then asked Firefox to show the source of the page. There you can see the
urls to
the images, for example:

<a href='img/images/very_second_gumprints/Bathtime-for-Sister-Denise.jpg' ...

so now the only thing you have to do is concatenate the root address of
the site with the
relative url to the image: (this step could be different in other sites)

http://czaphotography.com/img/images/very_second_gumprints/Bathtime-for-Sister-Denise.jpg

and voilá, the image on the screen, which then you proceed to save as
any other image.

Did I earn the 10 points? ;-)

Tom Sobota
Madrid, Spain

Camden Hardy wrote:
> Don's right...it's amazing what you can do with images from the web. This
> is one of the advantages to the Lightbox technology used in Chris' site
> (and mine too). It makes it much harder for people to save the images to
> their computer.
>
> 10 points for the first one to figure out how to do it ;)
>
>
> Camden Hardy
>
> camden@hardyphotography.net
> http://www.hardyphotography.net
>
> On Thu, June 22, 2006 9:51 am, Don Bryant wrote:
>
>> Actually Loris I can uprez with pretty good quality from screen captures.
>> As
>> an experiment I did just that with a famous photogs website and using PS
>> bicubic I had amazingly good results when printed as an 11x14 inkjet print
>> using QTR.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:56 AM
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>> Subject: RE: czaphotography.com website up
>>
>> Wow! Don, what interpolation program are you using? Must be a very good
>> one since you can make good quality (not instantly obvious that it's a
>> repro) inkjet prints from a 400 - 500 pixel image (in the longest
>> dimension) ;)
>>
>> Seriously, according to you is there the risk of someone making good
>> quality and reasonably sized repros (see the criteria above) from
>> 500-600 pixels images one shows in the web? According to my knowledge
>> this pretty unlikely.
>>
>>
>> Regards & TIA,
>> Loris.
>>
>> P.S. The old/plain Print-Scrn trick works, therefore I take your comment
>> as a warning to Christina...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Don Bryant [mailto:dstevenbryant@mindspring.com]
>> Sent: 22 Haziran 2006 Perºembe 17:18
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>> Subject: RE: czaphotography.com website up
>>
>>
>> Yeah but I can't capture the images so I can print them on my inkjet
>> printer!
>>
>> Don Bryant
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on 06/22/06-12:37:47 PM Z