RE: Making carbon tissue

From: Loris Medici ^lt;mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: 03/26/06-06:03:00 AM Z
Message-id: <20060326120310.7E67D4305A95@spamf3.usask.ca>

Sandy, do you have a thickness preference or you choose the degree of relief
according to the image? I'm asking that because I never saw a carbon print
before and I don't have any idea about what does relief add too (or detract
from) the image...

TIA,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy King [mailto:sanking@clemson.edu]
Sent: 26 Mart 2006 Pazar 06:59
To: alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Making carbon tissue

Issues regarding thickness of carbon tissue are the following.

Thin, heavily pigmented tissue gives maximum printing speed but very little
relief. By thin I mean wet tissue height of .5mm or less.

Thick, lightly pigmented tissues gives maximum relief but printing times are
very long, 2X-4X more than thin tissue. By thick I mean a wet height of
1.0mm or more.

Sandy

>Hi everyone,
>
>I was reading Sandy King primer on carbon printing
>http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/arts/photography/specialphot/pigmen
>t/pri mercarb.htm and I wanted to have an idea on how tick the coating
>would be and I notice that his recommendations gave an increasing
>tickness of the coating with an increase in size. Here are the values
>I've calculated (5x7->0.092mm, 8x10->0.169mm, 11x14->0.221mm,
>16x20->0.315mm)
>
>I wonder what is the logic (if any) behind this increase in tickness
>with size? These values are also quite thin compared with others I've
>seen. What would you say in general about the tickness of the coating
>and what properties does it influence in (on) the print?
>
>Thanks
>Yves
Received on Sun Mar 26 08:57:44 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/10/06-09:43:47 AM Z CST