In a message dated 3/5/06 3:05:24 am, Ender100@aol.com writes:
>
> Note that I said PD, not PT, and my experience with an exposure scale of 2.9
> was with Palladium using Na2 as the contrast mix—which does have a small
> amount of Platinum in it—so you can choose to call it PD or a PT/PD mix if you
> wish, it doesn't matter so much to me.
>
> So my question to you restated is, do you not think an exposure scale with
> PD of Log 2.9 is possiblie or do you not think that an inkjet digital
> negative with a density of Log 2.9 is possible—or both?
>
> That was the clarification I was looking for.
>
Mark
Using a contrast control degrades the print to a point below the optimum.
Wouldn't it be better to use the right negative if you want the best print.
Terry
I come bck to the point
Received on 05/03/06-02:25:30 AM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:52 AM Z CST