Re: Brush development of palladium prints. RE: Potassium Oxalate developer for Platinum printing

From: Ender100_at_aol.com
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 16:44:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <30d.3a60a49.318a7016@aol.com>

Terry,

No need to be sorry & I'm not upset at all.

We all have our preferred workflows and I will happily stick to mine.

Best Wishes,
Mark "Tonal Subtlety" Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives--The Book
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com

In a message dated 5/3/06 3:27:47 PM, TERRYAKING@aol.com writes:

>
> Mark
>
> Of course one has to "to match the exposure scale of the PT/PD to fit the
> density range of the negative."  I prefer to do so by giving an appropriate
> exposure and developing in a manner which gives the density and gradation  I
> want. The method ofr getting the negative right first  gives me prints with the
> contrast range and gradation I am looking for..
>
> As currently fashionable  platinum printing  tends, to my eye, to lose in
> subtlety of gradation, I prefer to follow my method of getting the negative
> right rather than using contrast controls.  That is my preference. You do things
> your way, I'll do things mine.
>
> I am sorry that this upsets you so much.
>
> Terry.
>
Received on 05/03/06-02:44:55 PM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:53 AM Z CST