RE: studio cameras circa 1950s

From: Don Bryant <dstevenbryant_at_mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:36:12 -0400
Message-id: <001901c68357$24deea60$6401a8c0@athlon64>

AFAIK, there are no single weight papers being produced any longer

 

Don Bryant

 

  _____

From: eric nelson [mailto:emanphoto@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:46 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: studio cameras circa 1950s

 

DW paper is acceptable for HABS, well processed of course. Their reasoning
is that when you start putting thousands of DW prints into files/filing
cabinet etc., the paper thickness comes into play, taking up more storage
space. Given the quantities of prints they have and require from any given
location, one can see how this is an issue for HABS.
I've not seen any updates from them addressing this issue as I've not seen
any SW paper in a long time.

Eric Nelson

On 5/29/06, Jack Fulton < jefulton1@comcast.net> wrote:

You are absolutely correct Bob . . I was 'spinning off' on a tangent
there at the end
but this last ten days have seen me photographic a nearby historic
building, about
to be razed, for record keeping. There are HABS (historic American
Buildings Survey)
standards to follow, which require single weight glossy silver-
gelatin paper. There is
zero of that in ANY store in the San Francisco Bay Area. It does not
seem B&H in NYC
has any as well. But, I'll find some . . it frankly completely
surprised me though I've
known of the recent shortage of production.
        Cheers
                Jack

On May2006, at 4:00 AM, BOB KISS wrote:

> DEAR JACK,
> Ilford, Oriental Seagull, Kentmere, Bergger, and the eastern
European
> manufacturer (can't recall name) continue to make an excellent
> range of
> silver-gelatin papers...so there is neither a virtual nor real lack of
> excellent options. Yes, there has been a loss of passion now but
> it isn't
> due to a lack of excellent photo paper. As a matter of fact, what has
> survived are the best fine art silver-gelatin papers you could ever
> get. I
> haven't used Agfa or Kodak photo paper in two decades...they were
> simply not
> up to the standard of these manufacturers.
> CHEERS!
> BOB

 
Received on 05/29/06-01:37:04 PM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:53 AM Z CST