Re: Gum and inkjet

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum and inkjet
From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:38:53 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <6F834189-120B-4DEC-82D9-2B0C2D449E26@zeelandnet.nl>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <5C2DC46F1D90834FB62F4AF456B0778C08DF12@ednex511.dsto.defence.gov.au><6F834189-120B-4DEC-82D9-2B0C2D449E26@zeelandnet.nl>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

As I am working on my own carbon tissue now I have a question too. Has anyone tried pigmentbased inkjet inks for carbon tissue?

kees brandenburg
middelburg netherlands
polychrome.nl

They would probably work fine, but at what price? Maybe 10,000 times more expensive than other good alternative?

Sandy King

Follow-Ups:
- Carbon tissue and inkjet inks, Was: Gum and inkjet
  - From: Kees Brandenburg <ctb@zeelandnet.nl>

References:
- Gum and inkjet
  - From: "Arcus, Paul" <Paul.Arcus@dsto.defence.gov.au>
- Re: Gum and inkjet
  - From: Kees Brandenburg <ctb@zeelandnet.nl>