U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | [SPAM] Re: Selenium-toning Van Dyke Brown prints

[SPAM] Re: Selenium-toning Van Dyke Brown prints




Toning after fixing and a long final wash is the *only* way I would consider using selenium with VDB. Selenium reacts readily with any soluble silver salts left in the print after development and this causes staining. This is the reason for the yellow or yellow-pink color. If you want nice clean highlights with VDB the only way to get them IMO with selenium toning is to fix the print and thoroughly wash it before toning. Not just a wash of 5-10 minutes, but a very thorough wash.

Sandy





Interesting to hear everyone's experiences. I used a much weaker solution of KRST (I would estimate around 1:500) and toned /after/ fixing, for about 1-2 minutes. The colour change is not huge, but very noticeable. After re-examining my KRST-toned prints last night, I can see a bit of a yellow hue emerging in the highlights (though not much), but more significantly, the heavy red cast of untoned VDBs is gone and replaced with a more neutral brown.

I haven't tried gold/thiourea toning (I was reluctant to cough up the dough for gold chloride -- though after seeing Loris' scans, I think I will try) but I prefer the colour of my KRST-toned VDBs to untoned VDBs.

Jordan


Loris Medici wrote:
Camden, add me to the list... I absolutely didn't like the (yellowish) color
I got from Selenium toned (1:200) Vandykes. I prefer better the original
unaltered color OR the color I get after gold/thiourea toning.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] Sent: 25 Eylül 2006 Pazartesi 18:42
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Selenium-toning Van Dyke Brown prints

Jordan,

I've toned VDBs in Kodak's Selenium before, and I was actually quite
disappointed. I guess I just prefer the untoned colors for my VDB prints.

Camden Hardy

camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net



On Mon, September 25, 2006 9:06 am, Jordan Wosnick wrote:
Hi everyone,

I would be interested in hearing from people who selenium-tone their VDB prints.

I was prepared to be disappointed when I tried it (based on Wynn White's article on Unblinkingeye and posts on APUG) but was actually quite pleased. I used a tiny amount of Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner (literally a few drops in a tray of water) and toned after fixing. The colour change began almost immediately and eliminated the somewhat sickly reddish-brown of the VDB, pushing it much closer to a warm gray-brown.

Based on what I had read, I was expecting a huge amount of image reduction, but I didn't see much at all.

Anyone else tone their VDBs in KRST?

Thanks

Jordan


--


Jordan Wosnick
jwosnick@fastmail.fm




--


Jordan Wosnick
jwosnick@fastmail.fm


Content-Type: text/plain; name="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.417 (Entity 5.417)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx4.clemson.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
postmaster@clemson.edu for details.

Content preview:  Interesting to hear everyone's experiences. I used a
  much weaker solution of KRST (I would estimate around 1:500) and toned
  /after/ fixing, for about 1-2 minutes. The colour change is not huge,
  but very noticeable. After re-examining my KRST-toned prints last night,
  I can see a bit of a yellow hue emerging in the highlights (though not
  much), but more significantly, the heavy red cast of untoned VDBs is
  gone and replaced with a more neutral brown. [...]

Content analysis details:   (5.2 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.2 MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP   Beta rule: an non-attributed IPv4 found in
                            headers
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
 1.0 MR_DIFF_MID            MR_DIFF_MID
 2.0 NO_RDNS2               Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
 2.0 RATWR10_MESSID         Message-ID has ratware pattern (HEXHEX.HEXHEX@)