RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:48:15 -0600 (MDT)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <00f701c6f0e0$82af39a0$51a0fea9@NEWDELL>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <55235.69.144.200.234.1160898216.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><00f701c6f0e0$82af39a0$51a0fea9@NEWDELL>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6

So I'm looking at this test print again, and just noticed something.  The
stain wasn't caused by the emulsion.  It was caused by the potassium
oxalate.

Any recommendations on getting all the developer out, or will I have to
use it one-shot?  I rinsed the print before putting it in the
clear...should I just rinse it longer?


Camden Hardy

camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
  - From: EJN Photo <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>
- RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
  - From: Clay <wcharmon@wt.net>

References:
- RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
- RE: Potentially stupid pt/pd question
  - From: Eric Neilsen <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>