Re: duct tape

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: duct tape
From: etienne garbaux <photographeur@nerdshack.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:31:01 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <000b01c71830$6fd9f3c0$300cd6d8@k1t0l0>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <58505.153.90.248.51.1164925726.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><002a01c714d5$caa9be60$b1d6ea46@D6RJ5R41><58124.69.145.80.167.1164943368.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><658E067B-BF88-4789-AAFE-9B6228E1356F@bellsouth.net><60484.153.90.248.51.1165250094.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><D997C307-1700-4B00-9834-96F25986CA12@bellsouth.net><60544.153.90.248.51.1165260214.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><Pine.NEB.4.64.0612042141590.22290@panix2.panix.com><000b01c71830$6fd9f3c0$300cd6d8@k1t0l0>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

John wrote:

> It is actually bad tape for most purposes including duct work. The adhesive
> dries out and separates from the metallic cloth backing.  .I have seen it
> used on electrical wire and it "CONDUCTS ELECTRICITY"!

There is duct tape, and then there's duct tape.  Good duct tape is almost
as good as real gaffers' tape.  (Yes, sadly, lots of folks sell "gaffers'
tape" that isn't any better than mediocre duct tape.)

Best regards,

etienne

Follow-Ups:
- Re: duct tape
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>

References:
- Pictorico pinholes
  - From: Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield@bellsouth.net>
- Re: Pictorico pinholes
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
- Re: Pictorico pinholes
  - From: Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield@bellsouth.net>
- Re: Pictorico pinholes
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
- duct tape
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: duct tape
  - From: John Cremati <johnjohnc@core.com>