Re: Karen mail

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Karen mail
From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:55:58 -0500 (EST)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <45A0920D.3CC0E5FE@t-online.de>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <BAY135-F32A1B4CBF7D0574E051A4CD0BE0@phx.gbl><1255.69.145.80.167.1168056533.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><004e01c73201$1abcb7c0$0502a8c0@rw55c0f9618934><58343.69.145.80.167.1168140621.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net><45A0920D.3CC0E5FE@t-online.de>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

I've deleted my Karen mail, but something occurs to me.... of course it's not my problem, but the point has a certain interest. As I recall, Karen was writing from her office. Or rather, since I don't recall her *writing* to the list, she was at least *reading* from her office. Is that considered OK, or just customary?

J.

References:
- Karen mail
  - From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
- Re: Karen mail
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
- Re: Karen mail
  - From: richard@rwc.my-bulldog.com
- Re: Karen mail
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
- Re: Karen mail
  - From: Kai Hamann <kaihamann@t-online.de>