Re: "ultimate alt process"

[Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Cc: <alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: "ultimate alt process"


> Would someone please explain (words of one syllable would 
> be OK) the connection between the alleged "Willy Kuhne" 
> and the presumed William Willis, whose patent of 1873 (or 
> 6) has been cited in tones of serious nyah nyah nyah in 
> response to my citation of a bridge completed in 1883 -- 
> even assuming for the purpose -- any purpose -- that Kuhne 
> was a real person and his alleged "invention," whether in 
> 1878 as alleged, or some other year, even 1875... was 
> "brilliant."
>
> J.
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Richard Knoppow wrote:
I was referring to Bob Kiss's post. I did not look for 
pattents issued to Willy Kuhne nor have I ever heard of him, 
which means nothing.
   I agree with you that I would suspicious of historical 
research that had no citations included.

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com