RE: Artistico Unsized?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: RE: Artistico Unsized?
- From: Ron Guidry <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;b=n3Uu+Dc+AcmcdU5AIQrsMq7euKpSmbdQ/xVeP/39OsqaIBB5XfBhbmZ8p+Z2xnJPEFzxyN56puwoLMUub0aXLBICNkRX0qeP40i/bU57MKcehq/NZwHa0gk0Mi6mHEpiTUrkSUjy5SWRSW3AyAbsD4k6KsouAEo/m3XD4E9P92s=;
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
I think that I may have found a solution to your problem. This is an ingenius (at least I think so) procedure that Richard Sullivan came up with to solve the problem of paper shrinkage and registration for gum printing. The link is: http://web.archive.org/web/20050304002732/www.bostick-sullivan.com/Technical_papers/substrat.htm
Hope this helps,