Re: Epson 3000 still a viable option?

[Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Erie Patsellis wrote:

> Don,
> I already have a HP8750 that I like, but the 13x19 limit is a little 
> restrictive (alot of my work is scanned LF negatives, that due to a lack of 
> darkroom, I can't print at the moment) With my upcoming 16x20 camera almost 
> finished, I have a way to scan, but not print, and it seems pointless to scan 
> a 16x20 neg to print smaller.
Erie, there are many easily done "alt" processes that don't require a 
darkroom... they're not that light-sensitive: You can do, for instance,
cyanotype & Van Dyke (to name just the easiest ones) in normal room 
light, though you do need ultraviolet bulbs to print them. (Unless you can 
find some sun.)

Judy