U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS--- First define "post-modern"pho

Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS--- First define "post-modern"photography, dammit



It's an history thing. Reference.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS--- First define "post-modern" photography, dammit


On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Eric Neilsen wrote:

Excuse me for asking, but why do you (and not just you) feel the  need to
classify singular humans and their actions, into categories?
I don't, actually.





-----Original Message-----
From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:18 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS--- First define "post-
modern" photography, dammit

Interesting; the post quoted below also seems to combine
poststructuralism and postmodernism