U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?

Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?
  • From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:20:41 -0600
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;bh=l/QwhbaSDz/DVIdG7kSRUu0fs6HIBdMlAiAYltTSssQ=;b=oGzr2QmWMY4i7W7lCzYhwdnsrv9vVpPpsnDJkN7yktaWdK71xpMA7BrWHV+hXEZg7PVv3D8ly+hzC2bl1K5fcwlJr+iAL5P1SUZjrBsmmOwWwTikgpIN4iY2l/XtG0b49+lWTprV3j03ZNSt+m1GiZs3iKyAEIElbyzp1uSF90E=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=Kyb7LmISAdi50Zv/kLi6+x4wZc2y4RAwROePavLFG5+80n6tbo7sNZd4OjT7EiJ2kE+BeK98Ydu6xzefmWtSS9Jzn6fvfNpnc5V0znfO+muqoZFSaSvXI/lRxuDwA4WOS9q9fl7e69re0TrSaUnvjq0dP3MZtiEfjjucZVLQpXI=
  • In-reply-to: <998a95e27d723cf48cc13b74555accdf@turtlesilk.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <98766a900712041051v206b1a23sbdc96828fc713b0d@mail.gmail.com><998a95e27d723cf48cc13b74555accdf@turtlesilk.com>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Thanks for the testing.  I'll go ahead and load my printer with pigment ink.


On Dec 4, 2007 6:06 PM, Linda Stinchfield <linda@turtlesilk.com > wrote:
I have DuraBrite inks, not Ultrachrome, but both are pigment-based, I
believe. And smearing on mineral oil-- by any name-- just now didn't
seem to hurt the ink at all.

Linda S.

On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Keith Gerling wrote:

> Ahh, but if some kind soul would print a postage-sized print with
> Ultrachrome inks and smear a little baby oil on it to see what happens
> - well, I would be eternally grateful.