Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:46:49 +0100
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <005801c87be3$75108a30$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <001401c87b3d$2daf8c00$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><20080301064632.14717.qmail@webmaild.fe1.aruba.it><003601c87bb4$6df5bc90$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><0CFF454D-C0FE-48F1-A14F-1A01A605836B@bellsouth.net><005801c87be3$75108a30$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Dear List,
thanks to Christina, and in agreeement with her, I have uploaded part of the Reilly's book "Care and Identification of 19th Century Photographic Prints" in
http://www.grupponamias.com/reilly/
Alberto

Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
  - From: Gregg Kemp <gregg@roanokesound.com>

References:
- Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
  - From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
- Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
  - From: sam wang <stwang@bellsouth.net>
- Re: possible answer to archivalness comparison between carbon gum andpt/pd
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>