Re: A few gum things
From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com> Subject: Re: A few gum things Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:00:37 -0400 (EDT) > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Ryuji Suzuki wrote: > > > From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com> > > Subject: Re: A few gum things > > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:38:51 -0400 (EDT) > > > >> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Ryuji Suzuki wrote: > >> > >>> The beauty of glut hardening is that the paper is ready to use > >>> as soon as it dries, > >> > >> That's the first suggestion I've heard that other hardeners aren't. > > > > That doesn't mean what you didn't hear do not exist. > Ryuji, throughout my post I was referring (as you perfectly > well know) to the materials and methods we use and can > access for alt... not materials used in factory or > laboratory production, that the brilliant Ryuji can look up > in a catalog or reference from Polaroid or Kodak, et al. I'm not the one who arbitrarily set the universe to be narrower than it is. I consider all known users and manufactuers of photographic materials, and not just a circle of "we" (see quoted text above) narrow minded people, or whoever people known to a specific participant of this list, which take up 99% of the world, of course. I further say that some participant of this list seems to use the following type of rhetoric: "I've never seen/heard of xyz, and therefore you (1) are wrong; or (2) didn't explain xyz enough." This type of posts seldom advanced anyone's knowledge in photography. It is far more useful to google xyz. Rather, it has been a source of flame wars or waste of time at best. I'm not interested in this. Remember, ULF. You are free to avoid or disapprove glutaraldehyde as a hardener, but if you want to waste time, or start a flame war, please pick someone else's post. -- Ryuji Suzuki "People seldom do what they believe in. They do what is convenient, then repent." (Bob Dylan, Brownsville Girl, 1986)
|