Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde
From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:26:27 -0400 (EDT)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0804191326050.982@panix2.panix.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <JYZVW4$7E340A5B7D6106EB3A979B41DE91086C@libero.it><Pine.NEB.4.64.0804090047460.29582@panix2.panix.com><58cbaf39164d9394837332353d2747ad@mindspring.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0804191326050.982@panix2.panix.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Don't ask me how that last went to the list. I must have been asleep at the time. I daresay it could have been worse, but anyway, sorry !

PS. The Seder was great & the food heavenly. Unfortunately, daughter brought the leftovers here and I am totally out of willpower.

J.

References:
- Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde
  - From: Alberto Novo <alnovo@inwind.it>
- Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde
  - From: Alan Dehmer <woodsedge@mindspring.com>
- Re: glyoxal v. formaldehyde
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>