Re: lith film

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: lith film
From: ryberg <cryberg@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:56:25 -0700
Cc: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <98766a900809081212l317f3fcembecaf2304db99456@mail.gmail.com><48C772DD.8010708@alcatel-lucent.be><98766a900809100837y5effddf9s3cfa3f4ba4a56a4f@mail.gmail.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0809102103160.25851@panix1.panix.com><A40A4D57AB1C4EBD85519B1C9CB2C436@DSPERSONAL><1B678EBB0A544C8C945C715BD07113DF@VALUED20606295><48CDB590.2060001@shelbyvilledesign.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

In the unlikely even that I ever need to develop low contrast lith film I'll certainly use either LC1 or LC2 (I've forgotten which I used, but it worked like a charm). Cheap and easy to make with still available chemicals.

References:
- lith film
  - From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>
- Re: lith film
  - From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>
- Re: lith film
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- RE: lith film
  - From: Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>
- Re: lith film
  - From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: lith film
  - From: Erie Patsellis <erie@shelbyvilledesign.com>