Re: Dichromate concentration question
 
 
I will not say a thing about cold out here for we are having an  
 
unseasonable heat spell and fear 
drought. I will say it was 30 below once in NV when there and I found  
 
it surprisingly not that cold. 
Oh . . . .  welllll, certainly it was cold, in fact extremely, but, in  
 
that odd way of living, it was just fine to 
walk around in, etc.
 
On Jan 15, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Katharine Thayer wrote:
 Oh, hmm, so it's actually warmer in your studio than it was in mine  
 
last winter.  But I'm glad you've got Toastie Toes, whatever they  
 
are; it sounds like something meant to keep your feet warm.  My main  
 
problem working in cold weather, other than the gum congealing, was  
 
putting my hands in the cold water; gosh that water was cold, just a  
 
few degrees above freezing.    Thanks for easing my curiousity, and  
 
happy printing.... 
Katharine 
 
 
 
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Keith Gerling wrote: 
 
Katherine, 
 
I'm sorry that I said it was only a tad warmer in the studio than the 
23 below outside.  It was 6:00 AM and I hadn't had my coffee.  It  
 
FELT 
like it was freezing, but it was probably 45 degrees.  ( so actually, 
it was a huge difference) 
 
Yes, the dichromate did settle out of the saturated solution.  And  
 
no, 
I don't have any problems coating the gum.  With the very low  
 
humidity 
I don't even have to use a hair dryer.  And I received a box of these 
Toastie Toes as a Christmas gift. so I'm fairly comfortable 
 
http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1232064603/ref=sr_kk_1?ie=UTF8&search-alias=aps&field-keywords=toastie%20toes 
 
 
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com 
 
> wrote: 
 
Keith, I'm glad someone knew where a chart was (glad to know about  
 
that 
myself) but I'm curious about something.  You didn't mention  
 
having a lot of 
the dichromate settle out of solution, which would be what would  
 
happen as 
the solubility decreased with the temperature.  Did you start out  
 
with a 
saturated solution? 
 
Also, I'm curious about your experience printing at such low  
 
temperatures, 
because I found last winter that I simply couldn't work in the  
 
cold; the gum 
simply wouldn't coat the way it should and prints were ruined  
 
because of the 
streaking and weirdness of the gum.  And this was at much warmer 
temperatures than you're talking about (above freezing).   It  
 
sounds like 
you've had no trouble with the gum itself, only with the  
 
exposures.  I don't 
think I had to adjust temperatures for the cold, but then it was  
 
only  30 
degrees below normal room temperature. 
Katharine 
 
 
 
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Keith Gerling wrote: 
 
 
OK, so I was exaggerating.  A tad.  Now that the sun is warming the 
studio, it is 10° C and according to the chart, I'm getting a  
 
little 
more that half the amount of dichromate that I would at a more  
 
typical 
20°C.   That is significant. 
 
Thanks for the link.  That chart is fascinating and I'm doing  
 
really 
well on the test. 
 
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Dirk-Jan Treffers 
<dirkjan.treffers@gmail.com> wrote: 
 
 
Hi Keith, 
 
just for fun, check 
http://www.sciencegeek.net/Chemistry/taters/solubility.htm 
The line for K2Cr2O7 (pot dichrom) drops dramatically when  
 
reaching 0° C 
(32° F).... Although it looks like the lower the temp gets, the  
 
more 
asymptotic the line becomes.... 
Try printing the graph on a bigger piece of paper, and draw the  
 
x-axis 
further to the left, and see where the graph would more or less be 
(concentration-wise) at -30°C (-22° F).... 
 
My guess would be 3-4%. That seems not nearly enough to really  
 
become 
light-sensitive.... Try Chris's suggestion to use Am-dichrom.  
 
Maybe at 
-22°F 
that would result in a higher concentration of dichromates.... 
 
 
Good luck with the icy temperatures.... Here in Holland we just 
experienced 
-10 to -15 (night time, 5-14°F). At those temperatures,  
 
everybody is 
hoping 
for an 'elfstedentocht' (eleven-city tour, a 200 km ice-skating  
 
tour 
trough 
eleven cities, something 90% of the Dutch wants from time to  
 
time.  See 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elfstedentocht  )... Ok, enough off- 
 
topic 
nonsense..... 
 
 
deejay 
 
 
 
 
2009/1/15 Christina Z. Anderson <zphoto@montana.net> 
 
 
 
LOL poor you, Keith--apparently this cold snap missed Montana,  
 
but is in 
MN big time.  It is in the 30's and 40's outside so it feels  
 
like spring 
to 
me here, but my son is experiencing -38. 
 
You're not SERIOUS when you say your studio is only a "tad"  
 
warmer than 
-23, are you?????  Is your dichromate solution an ice cube??? 
 
As far as pot di, this is, again, a reason I prefer am di  
 
because down 
to 
32 degrees am di is still 15% soluble, and that is what I use  
 
it at 
anyway. 
But if pot di starts at 10% solubility max, I've read it goes  
 
down to 
about 
5% at colder temps (not -23 though!!).  BUT I have no idea how  
 
this 
correlates to exposure so am not answering your question, only  
 
guessing 
that 
a stop more exposure might be it. 
Chris 
__________________ 
 
Christina Z. Anderson 
http://christinaZanderson.com/ 
__________________ 
----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Gerling" 
<keith.gerling@gmail.com> 
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:53 AM 
Subject: Dichromate concentration question 
 
 
 
 
As I sit typing the temperature outside is -23F.  My studio is  
 
a tad 
warmer, but I have noticed a dramatic change in what I need for 
printing times for gum.  We all know that "saturated"  
 
solutions change 
with temperature, and the cautious printer will weigh out the 
chemicals.  But is there a multiplier I can apply to my printing 
speeds that will take into account the actual amount of  
 
ingredients 
contained in my "saturated" solution of Potassium Dichromate at 
different temperatures? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |