RE: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
From: Robert Young <rwybeaker@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:09:55 -0600
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <W919191203886061233092016@webmail44>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <W919191203886061233092016@webmail44>
Reply-to: rwyoung@ieee.org
Resent-date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:10:18 -0600 (CST)
Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
Resent-message-id: <20090128141018.6567F13AC41@www.usask.ca>
Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:33:36 +0000
From: editor@magnachrom.com
Subject: Re: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

why wouldn't the photographer simply DEVELOP the paper negative "normally" then just scan the dried print?

M

It would go BLACK. Think about it for a moment, this is a gross overexposure.

Rob

Follow-Ups:
- Sunburn
  - From: Ron Flory <RFlory@mulkeyinc.com>
- Re: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>

References:
- Re: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
  - From: editor@magnachrom.com