Re: Overpriced Underpants

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Overpriced Underpants
From: Don Sweet <don@sweetlegal.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:28:33 +1300
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <747674.61072.qm@web54006.mail.re2.yahoo.com><B861914D-24FF-4F0E-BC4A-F54EAF94B9E7@mac.com><D9EEF2C2F0F245C7A92611475255F8EB@VALUED20606295>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

It is symbolic only.  I think it arose because someone asked a question
about Photoshop upgrade prices that was deemed impertinent by the presiding
deities.
Don Sweet

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: Overpriced Underpants

>      What is this thread doing in this mailing list?
> 
> --
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Ryuji Suzuki <rs@silvergrain.org>

References:
- Overpriced Underpants
  - From: ric kb <ric_kb@yahoo.com>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Christoph Hammann <chammann@mac.com>
- Re: Overpriced Underpants
  - From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>