Re: another 3 layer gum attempt

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: another 3 layer gum attempt
From: Jim Larimer <jrlarimer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:19:00 -0600
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;bh=YJNpK7psCdIOcD92psxSffsjd/i89KAIXML9GS3HNHQ=;b=BeytQEwDsoscZgnea4KcfadcqX/4MKZL8uMLL5NjLk6gTnJl9iAmiz6RBO9Firr3pSnBkZRH8VWlPhoTilA6MD6TOfHHWhu2vAGnoGo1N69g8xhU8AN5UuUOBG/8ymfyCLjQPgvZYAYmnlSlU36O8YfHeGEn5UNPBiHLlrr0FYw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;b=Ls8a38zdIGGrPICyh5DtSVZZFYhw7xdw1YJwzfLxiappuHIaXlGL7p5mPnn2OQ16JXLDueJ8+jXNmpOhK8OAvMM8Dg35j6lLQUt3fhwDliDb0kcElx4j2Lz8ceam9k7t3cAc6ENxCpLXxNzRDhd6ZydNfUd3ni/gFS7ceuQjHe4=
In-reply-to: <000a01ca0417$42533a30$7000a8c0@dell4600>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <d64.41189a96.377cded7@aol.com><006c01c9fb96$1c92d1e0$7000a8c0@dell4600><COL116-W4642E7F0B13BA0D2A549CBB2C0@phx.gbl><001801c9fc71$b29df490$7000a8c0@dell4600><D5834933-B6D1-431D-B0CE-242C2C58EB73@loris.medici.name><Pine.NEB.4.64.0907042320460.3881@panix1.panix.com><A1168DE6A56D4FA0A498313D7856368D@DC5YX7B1><000301c9fdb5$c0b009c0$7000a8c0@dell4600><COL116-W22349DC9F749E35ED19898BB2B0@phx.gbl><000a01ca0417$42533a30$7000a8c0@dell4600>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

You are doing good, Paul! Just a guess, but I think that a less dense negative is the answer.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net> wrote:

Hello everyone...hope you had a nice weekend.

I tried another 3 layer gum print (same image as before) and althought the colors are better than the last time I did 3 layers only, I'm not getting enough color down to give my print a nice strong density. I'm getting good strong color in the clear borders...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/viapiano/3718825618/

I'm getting good clearing in approx 20-40 minutes...

My guess is I should be using a less dense negative. Do you all concur?

Thanks to everyone for your help...

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another 3 layer gum attempt
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

References:
- Re: Masking contact prints
  - From: Argon3@aol.com
- Re: First tricolor gum
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
- RE: First tricolor gum
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
- Re: a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
- RE: a few notes on my first few gum prints...
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- another 3 layer gum attempt
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>