RE: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question
From: Don Bryant <donsbryant@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:52:27 -0400
Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:in-reply-to; bh=dmyrGONqwlT4nij8V7m4YFyJ/wCJ+/5mj1IU2mPW/gc=;b=xOqDaAAiSgxOleNlEPhEnGvL1U9NBkeYUgljm36fHw4wG8vQocJyg64vgIJajqOYogr68OAVbEZueW719mupgohTefs4uMziP8HFKkGyuw/Zbhx8WxrRTWhWAv+e21BvXWZb/XXW/GE5Py+XOVZox1BTTmJzCprf7XP8gEDwYxU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:in-reply-to;b=ANQ1RfJMYn48LndhonBs0UCBaChSatc75JZNt/zPQorYtRiVXxVrM8pADuzOYc7C0K7czHbPyFqomQTQgqYad1RkCPiWZmT6xwLO9g5/54qW/6B2W3sXwP16cbijXoOJJjwip38uNIEL9/HFDA96j/c+F5ZBQg4glRgbMttkBuY=
In-reply-to: <003d01ca4952$f290eb10$7000a8c0@dell4600>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <4ACF832A.4090904@tomkershaw.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0910091526370.2815@panix1.panix.com><COL116-W17FF9C155C3BA85D663204BBCB0@phx.gbl><725fa8580910091348o15f2fab1m61c6d6062c95751a@mail.gmail.com><4ACFBBFE.2060703@web.de> <002601ca4933$5d1a60d0$7000a8c0@dell4600><4ACFD184.1070500@web.de> <003d01ca4952$f290eb10$7000a8c0@dell4600>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcpJUv6IwJY6UoGVRrGUtmMOQ0CIGgAAYMbg

Paul,

I haven’t printed so much palladium on BFK but it is one of my favorite papers for gum, FWIW I prefer the water marked side.

Don Bryant

From: Paul Viapiano [mailto:viapiano@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:40 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question

Hi all...

I was given a package of this paper (don't think it's the heavyweight version) and was wondering if anyone prefers the "back" side which is smoother than the watermarked side...?

I thought I might try it in both processes, just for fun...

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question
  - From: Jeremy Moore <jeremydmoore@gmail.com>

References:
- Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Tom Kershaw <tom@tomkershaw.com>
- Re: Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Miracle size for gum
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
- Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>