[alt-photo] Re: "Alternative Printing": Terms to define
Earl and Patty Johnson
earlj at comcast.net
Mon Feb 15 12:40:17 GMT 2010
To get back to the original thought, is it only the print that
categorizes it as 'alternative' or 'alt-process'? That seems to be what
I am hearing from most of these posts. While this is a useful limitation
of the scope of an imprecise term, it leaves out some of the work that
has long been included in the alt-process category. Pinhole
photographers and wet-plate practitioners (I'm sure there are others)
whose prints do not fit the definition might object to being left out.
Loris Medici wrote:
> I think it's the "medium" that *has to be* clearly
> designated, to reveal the image forming process depends on personal
> choice...
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list