[alt-photo] Re: NICER NAME FOR INKJET?
Paul Viapiano
viapiano at pacbell.net
Sun Feb 13 07:19:10 GMT 2011
Mark,
I agree re "carbon print" terminology....and I love your "end of story"
story...!
Sometimes I've seen "Ultrachrome K3 Ink Print" or something similar and
thought that was a little funny, but to tell you truth I can see why a print
could be listed that way. A few years ago my wife bought an inkjet print for
me when she was on vacation from a photographer at an art show. He does some
nice work, but I filed the print away. A few weeks ago, I was going through
my stuff and found it. Totally faded...it was on HP paper but I have no idea
what printer he used. Faded, in complete dark storage for 2 years.
So maybe something like the above would be helpful to people who know about
such things. I don't think that I would ever buy an inkjet print, but if I
did, I would probably only trust one made on an Epson pigment printer on
appropriate paper.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nelson Mark" <ender100 at aol.com>
To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list"
<alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 7:50 PM
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: NICER NAME FOR INKJET?
Dan (Burkholder) & Judy, I agree with you folks. I think Archival Pigment
Inkjet Print , though wordy, is descriptive.
I went to a well known photo gallery in Chicago to attend and opening. They
artist was showing full color prints that looked like they could either be
inkjet, Lightjet, or even Lithographs beneath the glass. I asked the
gallery owner's assistant what type of prints I was looking at... she
replied "COLOR PRINTS, END OF STORY!" I felt like slapping her, the little
snot. I told her it wasn't "the end of story", because before I would ever
buy a print I would damn well know what kind of print I was buying. They
were "giclee" prints. I hate that term because it is a term that obsfucates
and tries to sound like more than what they are.
I have absolutely nothing against inkjet prints. I think they are great. I
just would like people to be honest use clear terminology.
I also really detest the use of "carbon print" for inkjet prints made with
quadtone inks. It is misleading. Sometimes I have asked about what kind of
prints were being shown and the gallery owner did not really know—that is
bad!
My rant is over.
Mark Nelson
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list