[alt-photo] Re: Epson 4900 Printer for digital Negs

[kerik at kerik.com]

 Rene,

 Yes, I've been using the 3880 for a few months after my 3800 went 
 south. It works very well, but I had to do a recalibration with QTR. Not 
 a big deal.

 Kerik


> Kerik, thanks for the link. The line about the 4900 clogging might 
> have just
> convinced me. I hate dealing with clogs. So are you using the 3880?
>
> I could work around the 8 X 10 issue and the acceptance of 6 X 38. I 
> had to
> tape a piece of 8 X 10 paper to the leading edge of my Epson 4000 to 
> fool it
> into taking that paper. And, I don't require roll paper.
>
> Rene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On 
> Behalf Of
> kerik at kerik.com
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:58 PM
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Epson 4900 Printer for digital Negs
>
>  Rene,
>
>  So far the 4900 isn't shown as supported on the QTR site:
>
>  http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRrequire.html
>
>  But presumably it's just a matter of time. That said, why choose 
> that
>  over the 3880 unless you need the roll capability.
>
>  Some info here to consider:
>
>  http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=953913
>
>  Good luck!
>
>  -Kerik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo