[alt-photo] Re: bottom-weighting mats
dspector at charter.net
Wed Nov 30 17:09:30 GMT 2011
This reminds me of a quote, I don't remember the source, supposedly from
Ralph Steiner's intro to his book "A Point of View":
"Ansel Adams . . . had flown from San Francisco to do a piece of work for
New York's Museum of Modern Art. He was busily doing that work when an
urgent phone call came from [Paul] Strand. Was Ansel busy; could he come to
Strand's apartment for an emergency consultation? Ansel allowed that he was
busy, but an emergency. . . . So Ansel dropped his work and took a taxi to
Strand's, He knocked, and, at Strand's invitation, came in.
Strand was bending over a work table on which lay a sheet of mounting board
and a small print. Strand shifted the print upward on the mount a half inch
and then downward, and said: 'Does it look better up here or down there?' "
FWIW, I use about 41% / 59% on most images.
From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
[mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:08 AM
To: Alt List
Subject: [alt-photo] bottom-weighting mats
How many of you bottom weight your mats and if so by how much? I have been
told that contemporary work has abandoned that practice, but uses mats of
equal size all the way around. Short of bringing a tape measure with me to
galleries, input on both sides of this issue much appreciated.
Christina Z. Anderson
Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list