[Alt-photo] Re: Brushing gelatin on paper
dlhbloomfield at gmail.com
Sun Dec 15 18:26:43 UTC 2013
The Rives "heavyweight" that I mostly use is from Talas, in NYC, and it seems to be 175 gsm. I've also ordered it from Daniel Smith, though, and their "heavyweight" is 280 gsm. So it really seems to vary, but both have worked fine for me (just the same). This heavier one that you can get may work equally well. I'd get a few samples, if it's accessible to you and try it. The Fabriano Artistico is 140 lb soft-press, extra white. It's the only Fabriano I've worked where I got no staining at all with no sizing (and no pre-shrinking). I don't pre-shrink the Rives, either. The soft-press is somewhat textured, but nothing at all like their cold- or rough-press-- but compared to the hot-press, it is lightly textured.
On Dec 15, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Luciano Teghillo wrote:
> Hi Diana,
> I will give it a try if I only could find those types of paper here.
> The Fabriano soft-press you use is textured? Also is it Traditional or Extra
> By looking at the Fabriano site there are so many choices...
> Artistico Traditional White:
> Artistico Extra White: http://www.fabriano.com/p/en/15/artistico_extra_white
> The BFK Rives heavyweight is this one?
> Thanks for the help,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
> Diana Bloomfield
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:45 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> Subject: [Alt-photo] Re: Brushing gelatin on paper
> Hi Luciano,
> This is just my experience, but when I used to size with gelatin, I never
> felt I got things quite right, and once I started printing-- it worked out
> okay-- no staining-- but I could always see a difference where the gelatin
> went on too lightly in places. I suspect the paper I was using was textured
> enough that the gelatin was never absorbed evenly across the page. That
> unevenness always showed up in the final print (enough to bother me, though
> maybe others didn't notice it).
> And I'm sure lots of people still size their papers for gum, but there are
> at least two papers out there that I've been using that require no sizing at
> all (and I've made many multiple layers on prints). Other people on the list
> use them as well-- which is where I got the information. I also don't
> pre-shrink these papers, and have made prints up to 17x17. Maybe they would
> be fine bigger, too, but I don't currently have the capability of making
> bigger prints.
> One of the papers is Fabriano soft-press 140 lb; the other is BFK Rives
> heavyweight. I use both, and only just started using the BFK this past
> year. They're terrific. And as long as they keep making these papers the
> way they're made now, I would never go back to gelatin sizing (or any
> sizing) for gum printing.
> So when I read your description here, it just sounds so time-consuming and
> tiresome and primitive-- when you really don't need to do it all. Why not
> try one of these papers, and don't bother with sizing?
> On Dec 15, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Luciano Teghillo wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I have been looming in the back an enjoyed the wealth of information
>> all of you share. Of course I have not shared nothing because...well,
>> I am just getting my feet (actually my paper) wet, as you will see.
>> I have a question on brushing gelatin on paper. I have prepared the
>> usual mix of 30% gelatin and kept it at about 45-50 C and brushed it
>> with a foam brush on the print side of my Fabriano Rosaspina paper.
>> I brushed on two coats, after letting the first one dry for a day.
>> This morning I was getting ready to harden the paper in formalin but I
>> had the bad idea of comparing my sheets of paper with a couple of
>> scraps of papers I have from two previous workshops.
>> The papers I was using as a comparison where noticeably more yellow
>> (both Fabriano Artistico, Traditional White) when looked on a light
>> table, so my doubt is that my paper did not receive enough gelatin. Of
>> course I cannot be sure because the samples I used for comparison have
>> been tray sized and not brush sized. Also, for least one, the gelatin
>> used is similar to Knox (Paneangeli for the Italians), while I used
>> Photographers' Formulary Hard Gelatin (250 Bloom).
>> Also when I compare my sized paper against a sheet of the same unsized
>> paper, I cannot see any discernable difference, even under an 8x loupe.
>> When brushing I load the foam brush, and move horizontally, vertically
>> and diagonally with speed (not quite the same as when you coat with
>> pigment, but almost), and make sure the brushing is uniform by looking
>> at the surface from an angle.
>> Maybe I brush to fast and "pull" the gelatin too much that it does not
>> get into the paper?
>> Since I have already wasted and entire set of Fabriano Artistico that
>> I presume I sized incorrectly, I want to make sure this time I do it
>> Maybe is something totally unrelated to sizing. Maybe I should harden
>> the gelatin before making a comparison.
>> I tried to scan the paper samples (mine and those used as a
>> comparison) it's useless. You can only see the paper ridges and
>> valleys, but nothing else.
>> I have posted however two images on a previous test I did. The only
>> thing different between the two tests is the paper. Everything else is
>> the same, done on the same day, developed for the same time, etc.
>> - http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/test01.jpg - This paper was
>> sized by someone else.
>> - http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/test02.jpg - This is the paper
>> I sized on a previous batch.
>> Feeling frustrated....
>> Thanks for any help,
>> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list