To call ourselves "neo-secessionists" would be to ally ourselves with a
particular style in photography rather than suggesting anything about the
processes we use.
All I've read of the discussion so far persuades me that we are best sticking
to 'alternative'.
Peter Marshall
On Fixing Shadows, Dragonfire and elsewhere:
http://faraday.clas.virginia.edu/~ds8s/
Family Pictures & Gay Pride: http://www.dragonfire.net/~gallery/
and: http://www.speltlib.demon.co.uk/
>
> My favorite school of fine art photography is the "photo-secessionists."
> Certainly they made use of many processes we are calling alternative
> processes. Might I suggest
>
> we call ourselves "neo-secessionists"
>
> or the new secessionists. This would thus include all processes and
> print making methods that are not "straight" photography and at the
> same time indicate rebellion to the look associated with it.
>
> Bob Schramm
----------