Re: An alt-Photo organization?

Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Thu, 22 May 1997 18:01:05 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 22 May 1997, David C. Clark wrote:

> I have a lot of experience managing a nonprofit, and would strongly
> suggest organizing as a project of an existing 501(c)3 photographic
> organization. A startup group faces some real challenges in developing
> an active board of directors. Remember, the charge of the board of
> directors is the 3 g's - Get Money, Give Money or Get Out! You don't
> get the serious board members in the first few years.
>
> Groups that start off small and expect to grow usually have a lot of
> problems. 80% of most nonprofit's money comes from individual
> donations. Corporate & government grants are usually only for specific
> projects, and do not cover general expenses. You need a core of those
> $500 a year donors who know how to put the touch on their friends.
>
> You can organize as a 501(c)6 with no problems. Use the 501(c)3
> sponsorship when your donor needs the tax deduction. Remember you will
> be faced with several income tests as a 501(c)3.. Sales of donated
> prints will probably be the biggest fundraiser in the beginning, but
> will be limited to 1/3 of cash donations as a 501(c)3. You may find the
> ability to sell prints, even as a fundraiser, prohibited. Partner as a
> project with a big group like APERTURE of Friends of Photography, and
> you will be able to raise money much faster because the income will be
> matched against their much greater charitable income. Even when you
> count the usual 5% management fee. And the folks who buy those prints
> are the future power board members.
>
> David
>

I rest my case.

Judy