Re: Anthotype

Dan Estabrook (desta@ix.netcom.com)
Sun, 06 Jul 1997 03:02:45 -0400

Okay, here's what I know. The Anthotype was a development of Sir John
Herschel from about 1842, as part of his experiments towards trying to
develop a color photography. It is simply a photographic use of the
natural fading of the juices of flowers and plants. Flowers or leaves
are pressed or crushed with mortar and pestle, often with the addition
of a little alcohol, and the mixture pressed through muslin or
cheesecloth. This is brushed on paper, dried, then exposed under a
_positive_ for, oh, about a month(!)... The whites eventually bleach
out, leaving a brightly colored and rather detailed image.

According to the _Encyclopedia of Photography_, Herschel claimed that
the yellow japonica was most sensitive, then came the "blue tincture of
the double purple groundsel", but I'm sure there are many natural colors
that would work (finally something to do with "fugitive" pigments?!).
The real point is, as there is no processing and therefore no _fixing_,
these are not permanent. Yes, it's an absurd thing to pursue, but it
would make a fun experiment to open an alt-process workshop, if it
didn't take so long. (Supposedly a more alkaline mixture is more
sensitive.)

As for alcohol, I don't know. For all my involvement in these processes,
I'm still a poor chemist. Denatured alcohol got me some nice colors. As
for paper, it should be thin - the books say to wet the back before
applying, I assume to help the mixture soak in. (I haven't tried
sizing.)

What I'd love is the chemical know-how to jazz this up just enough to be
fun. For now, well, I just started three days ago. I'll let you know
what's up in a month - after the exposure's done.

Dan Estabrook

P.S. There are examples of Anthotypes at the Harry Ransom Humanities
Research Center at the University of Texas in Austin, and at the Museum
of the History of Science, Oxford. Haven't seen 'em...