re: IRIS

Philippe Monnoyer (Philippe.Monnoyer@fundp.ac.be)
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 19:30:35 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Charles Berger: "Re: IRIS inks"
Previous message: Marc Bruhat: "IRIS"
Maybe in reply to: Marc Bruhat: "IRIS"
Next in thread: Jadlupp@aol.com: "Re: IRIS"

At 17:53 8/07/97 +0200, you wrote:
>this message nullifies the precedent
>
>you know?
>Ilford merchandises currently in [france] an ink for IRIS appointed :
>"archived" who done not age before 20years unless 25% deterioration at 2
>meters of a window without sun (200 [lux])!
>commentaries?
>
>
>
25% is awfully too much for archiving ! To me, at least
I would prefer 1% in 1000 years.

Philippe

Next message: Charles Berger: "Re: IRIS inks"
Previous message: Marc Bruhat: "IRIS"
Maybe in reply to: Marc Bruhat: "IRIS"
Next in thread: Jadlupp@aol.com: "Re: IRIS"