Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)

Bob_Maxey@mtn.3com.com
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:48:17 -0700

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: High density negs on Ink jet"
• Previous message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Sil Horwitz: "Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"
• Next in thread: Michael Keller: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"

Please, everyone who has an idea about this, define continuous tone. This
gives a base line for comparison or every other process considered to be
Continuous, but might not be if you follow strict definitions. Face it,
black and white film is continuous tone for all intents and purposes.

RM

• Next message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: High density negs on Ink jet"
• Previous message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Sil Horwitz: "Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"
• Next in thread: Michael Keller: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:41