Richard Lahrson (tripspud@hooked.net)
Sat, 13 Feb 1999 11:04:40 -0800
Richard Lahrson wrote:
>
> > Katharine Thayer wrote:
> > > > I have a question that has always puzzled me, and that is; what is the
> > > > conventional thinking or opinion regarding print edges? I've seen
> > > > professional prints that show the pigment brushstroke in the border ...
>
> Look at the many ways photographs are presented: newspapers, magazines
> and the web. In personal wallets or hung in homes less pretensiously displayed
> than in art galleries. Filed in filing cabinets, dry mounted or "rag" taped
> with or without cut-out or frame and even on contact sheets.
>
> The old dags reflected the Victorian era's decorative cases, one of a
> kind image. Wood and steel frames, plain or ornate; sharp, defined borders,
> enlargement and contact prints showing the black borders, framed with no borders,
> presented unmounted with no borders, tiny prints on large mounts or visa versa.
> Brush strokes showing somewhat or a lot in alternative processes. In clear
> plastic print holders in binders. And colored or hued mount boards........
>
> Murals and billboards and still photos on television as well as museum
> display boxes in viewing rooms are all, and this is my point "presentations".
>
> Rich Lahrson
> > tripspud@hooked.netre:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:50