Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]

MMagid3005@aol.com
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:27:28 -0400 (EDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Kallitype: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Jack Fulton: "Color permanence + other notes"
• In reply to: Richard Knoppow: "(no subject)"
• Next in thread: MMagid3005@aol.com: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

Three cheers for Patrick! -- Marty Magid

• Next message: Kallitype: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Jack Fulton: "Color permanence + other notes"
• In reply to: Richard Knoppow: "(no subject)"
• Next in thread: MMagid3005@aol.com: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:31