Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]

MMagid3005@aol.com
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:55:03 -0400 (EDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Michael McKinney: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Peter Mikalajunas: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

I've got to agree with Adam in one respect, the quality of work that is
possible. A very large retrospective of Gordon Parks' work is currently at
the Detroit Institute of Arts, and his computer images are beautiful, but in
a different way than, for example, his work for Life Magazine. I'll see this
exhibit for the 3rd time this week, before it leaves. Us non-digital types
shouldn't be completely dismissive of what is possible. -- Marty Magid

• Next message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Michael McKinney: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Peter Mikalajunas: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:31