Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:39:38 -0700
Re: Gary Miller's point --
The thrust of the argument here took a modern tact. Not that it's a faulted
technique, but that the industry is dropping valuable products protected by
their patents that inhibit the photographic process in favor of continuing
digital R&D and merchandising at the same time re: computer digital imaging.
The one suffers by emphasis on the other, while at that same time the
industry itself is raping it's consumers by pushing incomplete research and
developed product [at the cost of old fine art products] which become
obsolete and contribute to the inflation of this all in all loss of finess
as end product, too.
Steve Shapiro, Carmel, CA
sgshiya@redshift.com
'the dude abides'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32