limited edtions...


Martin Franchi (mfranchi@ionsys.com)
Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:05:43 -0300


At 4:21 PM -0400 22/7/99, Judy Seigel wrote:

>In my observation -- and opinion -- "limited edition" as a concept is not only
>counterproductive, it's an insult to photography

Thank you Judy.

This is the beauty of photography, reproducible....hence you can make a
number of images so MANY people can enjoy them, the originals not some
digatized, scanned or poor reproduction in a book. Are you really
satisfied that only 25 or 50 people and some of their friends will ever see
your work?

You can donate some of your work to MOMA or some other institution, but
wait give away your work??? You made a "limited edition" to increase its
value and get you more money. Please.

I think we impose a cap on the number of prints we make, why??? Because
its BORING. To sit in a darkroom and make 1000 copies of the same image, I
won't do it.

Martin

                                                      \\\\|////
                                                       ( O O )
                ________________oOOo__U__oOOo________________
"I promise I shall never give up, and that I'll die yelling and laughing.
And until then I'll rush around this world I insist is holy and pull at
everyone's lapel and make them confess to me and to all."

                                                                Jack Kerouac



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:40:37