Re: Toning Cyanotype Brown

From: Jonathan Hall (platinumprint@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu Dec 16 1999 - 19:31:42 /etc/localtime


The comment of the cover image on Farbers book reminds me of how we all see
differently. To one it is merely a figure study showing light and form. To
another it is porn. To another it is about depression. To another it is
about quiet light and introspection. etc..

I take no offense at your comment Judy. On the contrary it reminds me of
how different we all are. The way we see. The different thoughts images
evoke.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Toning Cyanotype Brown

>
> However, whether you want the book or not is another question, depends on
> how you feel about Farber's artsy-fartsy soft-porn on the cover of your
> process texts, not to mention his even artsy-pornier inside.
>
> Judy
>
> .................................................................
> | Judy Seigel, Editor >
> | World Journal of Post-Factory Photography > "HOW-TO and WHY"
> | info@post-factory.org >
> | <http://rmp.opusis.com/postfactory/postfactory.html>
> .................................................................
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 12:10:48